Deep Throat Returns:

Orwellian? Not Really…

14 November 2002

Christopher Hitchens has a new book out called Why Orwell Matters.  I haven’t read it yet.  After looking at the Early Bird today, I’m thinking maybe I should.

 

But what I’m reading in today’s Bird isn’t Orwellian, not really.

 

There’s an article on the PPOG, you know, the “Proactive Pre-emptive Operations Group.”  Rummy’s pushing to have it controlled by DoD.   Proactive and Pre-emptive.   Whenever we suspect a bad guy, it is theoretically more efficient to just eliminate him.  Trials take too long and are unpredictable; holding folks for months and years without access to counsel or hearings is expensive.

 

And no, this isn’t like lynchings in the South, replayed globally.  Not really.

 

There’s something on Senator Warner’s plans “to review the 19th century Posse Comitatus law that restricts the military’s involvement in domestic law enforcement.” There are two more on this topic, an “Inside the Pentagon” article on Rumsfeld’s breaking the law by using the Army RC-7 in the Washington sniper search, and the L.A. Times on Ashcroft’s preference for the use of military courts over civilian.

 

DoD assistance and partnering with cops all over the U.S., complete with all the hardware and military training and authority that soldiers bring to the scene.  Not unconstitutional, and not like Waco.  Not really.

 

There’s a great article on the new Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)  Information Awareness Office.” This office is all about us and what we do online and on the phone, and John Poindexter is at the helm. You remember John, from TV, during Iran Contra.  Mastermind, you say? That conviction was overturned on appeal, so not really.

 

Today’s Bird gives us the London Guardian interview with Rummy advisor Richard Perle. Perle said Europeans have no “moral fibre ” because they are not rabidly frothing at the mouth for immediate U.S. led, everyone-shares-the-cost, forcible proactive regime-change in Iraq.  Well, he makes an exception for Tony Blair, so not really.

 

Hmmmmm.   Rumsfeld’s Rules contains a quote by F. Scott Fitzgerald. “The test of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.”

 

Fitzgerald died in 1940.  When Orwell wrote 1984  in 1948, he put forth a new version of this quote.  While the Fitzgerald version is older (like Rumsfeld), the Orwellian version is a lot more relevant.

 

“The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them” is not the sign of first rate intelligence, but instead it is the book definition of “doublethink.”

 

Doublethink is a “deliberate reversal of facts” and he writes, “if the High are to keep their places permanently -- then the prevailing mental condition must be controlled insanity.”

 

Controlled insanity is, in turn, required to sustain the ever-desirable “endless war.”  Richard Perle knows this, of course, and he already has a list of other places we will want to deal with after we finish Iraq.  Places like Iran, Syria, and Lebanon…  He mentioned North Korea, too, when he spoke with the London Guardian yesterday.  And don’t forget the resurgent Osama.  Two plus two equals four, except when it equals three or five.

 

I am sure that Rumsfeld and Perle and the rest of the leadership team are not interested in Orwell or his definitions.  And who needs controlled insanity when we can have the plain old normal kind around here!

 

Significantly, today’s Early Bird brings us news of the latest DARPA invention.  It’s an electronic device that fits into a bugle and plays taps.  All the “bugler” has to do is put his or her mouth to the bugle and push a hidden button, “giving the appearance of playing the tune” (but not really).

 

In true doublethink tradition, let me say with all due respect and with the sincerest of straight faces… it really blows!